Communication in Television

I chose to watch
an episode of Brooklyn Nine-Nine, which is a show that my boyfriend watches
regularly but I do not. When I first watched the show with the sound turned
off, I could only focus on nonverbal skills and cues. I noticed facial
expressions, gestures, eye contact, and body positions, which either hindered
or fostered communication between the characters.
One of the main
characters, Jake Peralta, seemed like he was getting in trouble by Captain
Holt. Holt had a stern face and did not have any welcoming or warm facial
expressions, and Peralta stopped smiling and his eyes dropped down as if he was
ashamed. I assumed that Holt was reprimanding Peralta in some way or delivering
bad news. They were next seated in a courtroom and Peralta looked nervous
because his eyebrows were furrowed and he kept gulping. The officers on the
other end of the courtroom all had stern faces and did not show much expression.
I believe this is because they did not have any good news for him. The scene
changed to Peralta arguing with Amy Santiago in a parking garage and they
looked angry with each other. Their gestures were abrupt and they had angry
looks on their faces. I assumed they were fighting about something that happened
in the courtroom. However, based on their body language they also seemed
comfortable with each other, and the expression on Santiago’s face demonstrated
she was frustrated but that she cared about Peralta. A group of men approached
them in the parking garage and had their arms by their sides. Peralta put his
hands on his hips defensively and looked at the men as they sternly spoke to
him. Peralta then started using hand gestures and moving his lips quickly,
which looked as if he was frustrated and defending himself.
I went back to
the beginning of the clip and turned the sound on to see if my assumptions were
correct about the interactions between the characters. My initial assumption of
Holt reprimanding Peralta was incorrect because Holt was actually giving
Peralta advice and asked him to trust him. In the courtroom, Peralta looked
nervous because he had taken Holt’s advice, and did not say anything to defend
himself. In the parking garage scene, Peralta told Santiago that Holt’s advice
was to get himself fired and that he was so frustrated he yelled in the
courtroom (which must have happened “later” in that initial scene). She was
shocked by the news that Holt would say something like that to Peralta and that
he no longer had a job with the New York Police Department. The men who
approached Peralta were from the FBI and explained to Peralta that they needed
him to be fired so he could work undercover for the FBI to continue the case he
was doing for the NYPD. When Peralta responded, I initially thought he was
frustrated and angry because of his gestures, but he actually was telling a
story to lighten the mood and said yes to working with the FBI.
This experience
was enlightening because I realized many of my assumptions were incorrect.
Watching the show without sound illustrated the necessity of having verbal cues
in addition to the nonverbal cues. I incorrectly guessed what the characters
were saying or feeling because certain nonverbal cues can apply to many
different contexts (O’Hair, Wiemann, Mullin & Teven, 2015). I also believe
if I were to have only listened to the show and not watched it I would have
missed essential nonverbal cues. I now understand how verbal and nonverbal
skills and cues work together to effectively get messages across.
Reference
O'Hair, D.,
Wiemann, M., Mullin, D. I., & Teven, J. (2015). Real communication (3rd.
ed). New York:
Bedford/St. Martin's.

Tara,
ReplyDeleteI had a similar experience as I was analyzing the tv show I chose this week. I found that I made assumptions about a tv show when I thought the characters were arguing, but they were actually giving advice. I came to the realization of how important it is to focus on the nonverbal, but also the verbal cues when having a conversation. Only focusing on the nonverbal cues can lead to confusion, and incorrect assumptions.
Also, this sounds like an interesting show; I have never seen it before!
Bri
Tara,
ReplyDeleteI also realized the importance of nonverbal cues and how they relate to verbal cues. To be competent communicators, both cues should work together to convey a message. My experience with this exercise was my assessment of the nonverbal cues was close but not spot on. Even the slightest discrepancy between the two can lead to misleading information. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and experiences with this blog assignment!
Trish
Hi Tara,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your blog. I have never watched that show by how you described it seemed very interesting. It is amazing how our assumptions can really be wrong when we see non-verbal cues from people and do not hear what they are saying. I do have to agree with you that verbal and nonverbal skills should word together effectively so we can get the message across.
Tara,
ReplyDeleteI hadn't thought about switching things around and what the experience would have been listening to the show without watching. I too made incorrect assumptions about the characters and their relationships with on another. I believe a similar things would happen with only the sound, however, I discovered that the verbal portion was the binding glue to the relationships for me. Although, I do believe that it would be nearly impossible to understand the full context of a scene without both the verbal and nonverbal communication.